🔍 Read the full analysis: The Difference Between Microsoft’s And Alphabet’s Investor Reception on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
TL;DR
After results released after the U.S. market closed on Oct. 28, Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading while Alphabet shares fell about 10%. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster than Azure, but investors also faced an earnings miss and negative free cash flow amid heavy AI-related spending.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading on Oct. 28, after the companies reported quarterly results that put their AI spending and cloud growth under investor scrutiny. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster than Microsoft Azure, but Alphabet also missed analyst forecasts and reported negative free cash flow, while Microsoft beat expectations and remained cash-flow positive.
Microsoft reported revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19% from a year earlier, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, above the $4.73 expected by analysts polled by LSEG, according to CNBC. Azure revenue increased 48% to $33.2 billion, exceeding the 45% growth rate Microsoft had guided to in July. The company disclosed Azure’s quarterly revenue in dollars for the first time.
Alphabet reported Google Cloud revenue of $30.7 billion, up 103% year over year. But Alphabet’s overall revenue, earnings per share and search advertising revenue fell short of analyst forecasts, according to the source material, which cites CNBC. Alphabet generated negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow for the quarter, its second consecutive negative quarter, while Microsoft reported positive free cash flow of $18.6 billion.
The spending figures help explain the divergent reaction, but they need careful comparison. Microsoft’s cash spending on property and equipment was $39.4 billion, twice the $19.4 billion reported a year earlier; including finance leases, its capital spending was $45.2 billion. Alphabet’s capital spending was reported as up 114% year over year. The source says Alphabet raised $28.7 billion through bonds and $12.4 billion by issuing shares during the quarter, and did not buy back shares.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shaped the Market Reaction
The results show why cloud growth alone did not determine investors’ response. Google Cloud’s 103% growth rate was more than double Azure’s 48%, but investors were also weighing Alphabet’s earnings miss and the cash cost of expanding capacity. Microsoft’s results, by contrast, paired strong Azure growth with an overall earnings and revenue beat and $18.6 billion in positive free cash flow.
That contrast matters because both companies are committing large sums to data centers, chips and other infrastructure to meet demand for cloud and AI services. Spending that exceeds cash generated by operations can increase reliance on borrowing or other financing. The figures do not establish which company will earn more from AI over time; they show that markets were responding to the near-term financial risk as well as growth prospects.
Investors must also distinguish contracted business from cash already received. Microsoft reported commercial remaining performance obligations of $677 billion, while the source gives Google Cloud commitments of $561 billion. These are future contracted amounts, not current-quarter revenue or cash in hand. Microsoft said about 30% of its commercial obligations were expected to be recognized as revenue within 12 months, with an average duration of 2.3 years.
Popular right now
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Dried Rose (KSM150PS)
Samsung 42-Inch S90H OLED 4K Smart TV Bundle
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Both Companies Are Scaling Capacity
The results reflect a broader constraint: both companies say demand for computing capacity exceeds what they can currently provide. Microsoft reported delays in some third-party capacity deliveries, pushing expected GPU deliveries into 2027. Alphabet has begun renting capacity from outside providers, according to the source material. Those measures underline that demand does not automatically translate into immediately available cloud service or revenue.
Microsoft’s capital spending plan for 2026 was described as about $170 billion, compared with an earlier estimate of about $175 billion. The source says Alphabet maintained its 2026 plan at $195 billion to $205 billion and indicated a substantial increase in 2027. These are planned or forecast amounts, not spending already completed. Microsoft finance chief Amy Hood said the company expects capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and an acceleration in the first half of 2027.
Microsoft also reported $10 billion in quarterly revenue from OpenAI, including revenue-sharing payments, according to its quarterly filing as summarized in the source. That amount was about 11% of Microsoft’s total revenue by the source author’s calculation. Microsoft’s Windows business was a weaker area: revenue from PC makers fell 27%, which the source attributes to weaker PC demand and a difficult comparison with the prior year.
Spending Plans Face Delivery Risks
The reported after-hours share moves are a snapshot from the evening results were released; the source does not provide subsequent regular-session performance. It also does not supply the full analyst-consensus data or detailed breakdowns needed to independently assess every reported earnings miss and spending comparison.
It remains unclear how quickly the delayed capacity will arrive, whether rented capacity will remain necessary, and how much of either company’s contracted backlog will become revenue on schedule. Backlogs represent commitments, not guaranteed near-term cash receipts. The source also cautions that Microsoft’s quarterly cash spending was lower partly because deliveries were delayed, so the quarter’s free cash flow may not reflect the pace of spending planned for coming periods.
The comparison is not a verdict on which company will ultimately win in AI. The companies use different reporting measures, and their capital plans and cash-flow results cover particular periods. Future revenue, financing needs and returns on infrastructure investment remain uncertain.
Investors Watch Spending and Supply
Investors will look for evidence in the next quarterly reports that Microsoft’s delayed deliveries have arrived and that Alphabet’s capacity expansion is supporting cloud revenue without further worsening cash flow. Microsoft has said its capital spending should exceed $50 billion in the current quarter and rise in the first half of 2027; the source says Alphabet’s 2026 plan is unchanged and points to a larger increase in 2027.
The next reports should also clarify whether cloud growth continues to exceed the pace of investment, how much contracted demand converts into recognized revenue, and whether the companies can add computing capacity fast enough to serve customers. Until then, the after-hours reaction reflects investors’ immediate assessment of the results, not a settled judgment on the long-term payoff from AI spending.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
Microsoft beat analyst expectations for revenue and adjusted earnings per share and reported $18.6 billion in positive free cash flow. Alphabet’s shares fell after it missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising and reported negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow, according to the source material.
Did Google Cloud grow faster than Azure?
Yes. Google Cloud revenue rose 103% year over year to $30.7 billion, while Azure revenue rose 48% to $33.2 billion. Those growth rates describe cloud revenue, not each company’s overall performance or cash generation.
What does negative free cash flow mean for Alphabet?
It means Alphabet’s cash outflows, including investment spending, exceeded the cash it generated after those outflows for the quarter. The source reports that Alphabet also raised money through bonds and new shares; the figures do not by themselves establish how much future financing it will need.
Are the companies’ cloud backlogs cash already received?
No. The reported $677 billion for Microsoft and $561 billion for Google Cloud represent customer commitments described in the source, not cash already collected or revenue recognized in the quarter. The timing of conversion into revenue varies.
What should investors watch in the next results?
Key indicators include whether delayed computing capacity becomes available, how quickly cloud commitments turn into revenue, and whether the companies can fund planned investment while maintaining cash flow. Microsoft has indicated higher near-term spending, while Alphabet’s 2026 capital spending plan was reported as unchanged.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
